The final direct-answer search preserves the existing ceiling discipline. Preston's verified forum answer remains score-moving, Laubacher's positive anti-corruption floor remains real but ceiling-limited, and Boebert has no located direct reform commitment beyond narrow official-record vectors.
- Preston directly addressed Citizens United / AmericanPromise and congressional stock trading in the verified forum answer.
- Laubacher has direct platform/forum support for stock-trading, dark-money/corporate-funds transparency, lobbyist-influence, voting-rights/fair-elections, and narrow no-corporate-PAC language.
- Boebert has narrow official-record vectors such as H.R.8314 foreign-money and transparency measures, but not a broad structural reform platform.
- Laubacher above 6.0 absent direct Citizens United, public-financing, or small-donor matching evidence.
- Preston above the current provisional posture absent broader implementation mechanics.
- Any broad no-PAC or fully small-dollar claim for Laubacher.
¶ Evidence limits and open questions
Searches were bounded to public-readiness. The next useful source class is questionnaires, local press, candidate forums, or archived issue pages only if score movement depends on them.